Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Riverbank
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $247,200 |
| White | 75% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 39% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Riverbank?
A: Pleasant Hill has a larger population count than Riverbank: 34662 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z