Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 75% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 13% | 13% |
| With Kids | 29% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 39% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 34662 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z