Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Pasadena
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $689,700 |
| White | 75% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 10% |
| Asian | 13% | 16% |
| With Kids | 29% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 39% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Pasadena?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 34662 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z