Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to National City
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $345,400 |
| White | 75% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 13% | 19% |
| With Kids | 29% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 39% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or National City?
A: Pleasant Hill has a smaller population count than National City: 34662 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or National City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z