Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Napa
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Napa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Napa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 79,722 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $51,449 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $536,800 |
| White | 75% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 39% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Napa?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Napa: 34662 compared with 79722 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Napa?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Napa?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 43% for Napa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z