Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Lancaster
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $213,100 |
| White | 75% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 21% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 39% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Lancaster?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 34662 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z