Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Burbank
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $574,300 |
| White | 75% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 11% |
| With Kids | 29% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 39% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Burbank?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 34662 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z