Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Baldwin Park
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $357,500 |
| White | 75% | 34% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 18% |
| With Kids | 29% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
| Rentals | 39% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Baldwin Park?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 34662 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z