Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Union City
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $620,200 |
| White | 33% | 21% |
| Black | 16% | 5% |
| Asian | 17% | 53% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 43% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Union City?
A: Pittsburg has a similar population count than Union City: 69449 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z