Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Pittsburg, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $322,800 |
| White | 33% | 36% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 10% |
| With Kids | 41% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or South San Jose Hills?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 69449 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z