Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to South San Francisco
This post compares Pittsburg, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 33% | 33% |
| Black | 16% | 2% |
| Asian | 17% | 39% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or South San Francisco?
A: Pittsburg has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 69449 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z