Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to South Pasadena
This post compares Pittsburg, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 33% | 54% |
| Black | 16% | 3% |
| Asian | 17% | 29% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or South Pasadena?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 69449 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z