Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Selma
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $171,200 |
| White | 33% | 78% |
| Black | 16% | 0% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 43% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Selma?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Selma: 69449 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z