Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to San Fernando
This post compares Pittsburg, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $370,300 |
| White | 33% | 57% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 1% |
| With Kids | 41% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or San Fernando?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than San Fernando: 69449 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z