Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to San Bruno
This post compares Pittsburg, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 33% | 49% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 28% |
| With Kids | 41% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or San Bruno?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than San Bruno: 69449 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z