Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Riverbank
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $247,200 |
| White | 33% | 79% |
| Black | 16% | 0% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Riverbank?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Riverbank: 69449 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z