Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $444,200 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 16% | 9% |
| Asian | 17% | 13% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Pittsburg has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 69449 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z