Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Lancaster
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $213,100 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 16% | 21% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Lancaster?
A: Pittsburg has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 69449 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z