Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Foothill Farms
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 33% | 67% |
| Black | 16% | 9% |
| Asian | 17% | 5% |
| With Kids | 41% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Foothill Farms?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 69449 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z