Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Fontana
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Fontana, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Fontana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 207,086 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $40,918 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $323,300 |
| White | 33% | 43% |
| Black | 16% | 8% |
| Asian | 17% | 6% |
| With Kids | 41% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 43% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Fontana?
A: Pittsburg has a much smaller population count than Fontana: 69449 compared with 207086 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Fontana?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Fontana?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 35% for Fontana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z