Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Eureka
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $249,300 |
| White | 33% | 75% |
| Black | 16% | 2% |
| Asian | 17% | 7% |
| With Kids | 41% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Eureka?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Eureka: 69449 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z