Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Dana Point
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Dana Point, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Dana Point (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 34,028 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $70,677 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $833,800 |
| White | 33% | 83% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 3% |
| With Kids | 41% | 22% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 48 |
| Rentals | 43% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Dana Point?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Dana Point: 69449 compared with 34028 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Dana Point?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Dana Point?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 39% for Dana Point.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z