Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Cudahy
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Cudahy (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 24,146 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $26,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $327,500 |
| White | 33% | 77% |
| Black | 16% | 0% |
| Asian | 17% | 0% |
| With Kids | 41% | 60% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 27 |
| Rentals | 43% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Cudahy?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Cudahy: 69449 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z