Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Chino Hills
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $567,200 |
| White | 33% | 46% |
| Black | 16% | 4% |
| Asian | 17% | 33% |
| With Kids | 41% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 43% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Chino Hills?
A: Pittsburg has a similar population count than Chino Hills: 69449 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z