Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Burlingame
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Burlingame, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Burlingame (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 30,401 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $93,145 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $1,591,600 |
| White | 33% | 61% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 24% |
| With Kids | 41% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Burlingame?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Burlingame: 69449 compared with 30401 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Burlingame?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Burlingame?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 52% for Burlingame.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z