Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Belmont
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 33% | 62% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 27% |
| With Kids | 41% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Belmont?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Belmont: 69449 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z