Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Baldwin Park
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $357,500 |
| White | 33% | 34% |
| Black | 16% | 2% |
| Asian | 17% | 18% |
| With Kids | 41% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Baldwin Park?
A: Pittsburg has a similar population count than Baldwin Park: 69449 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z