Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Atwater
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Atwater (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 29,118 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $35,415 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $179,400 |
| White | 33% | 58% |
| Black | 16% | 3% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 43% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Atwater?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Atwater: 69449 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Pittsburg versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z