Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Ashland
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $396,400 |
| White | 33% | 44% |
| Black | 16% | 17% |
| Asian | 17% | 20% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Ashland?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Ashland: 69449 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z