Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsburg to Altadena
This post compares Pittsburg, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsburg (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,449 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $46,928 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $324,500 | $649,800 |
| White | 33% | 53% |
| Black | 16% | 22% |
| Asian | 17% | 6% |
| With Kids | 41% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 43% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsburg or Altadena?
A: Pittsburg has a larger population count than Altadena: 69449 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsburg or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pittsburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsburg or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Pittsburg versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsburg may include: Fairfield, Suisun-City, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z