Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 55% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 10% |
| With Kids | 42% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 32 |
| Rentals | 33% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or South San Jose Hills?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 63750 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z