Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to South San Francisco
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 55% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or South San Francisco?
A: Pico Rivera has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 63750 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z