Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to South Pasadena
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 55% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 40 |
| Rentals | 33% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or South Pasadena?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 63750 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z