Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to South El Monte
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $389,400 |
| White | 55% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 34 |
| Rentals | 33% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or South El Monte?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than South El Monte: 63750 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z