Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to San Bruno
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $754,700 |
| White | 55% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 28% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or San Bruno?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than San Bruno: 63750 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z