Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to Riverbank
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $247,200 |
| White | 55% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 32 |
| Rentals | 33% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or Riverbank?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than Riverbank: 63750 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z