Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 55% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 3% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 35 |
| Rentals | 33% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Pico Rivera has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 63750 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z