Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to Laguna Hills
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $649,700 |
| White | 55% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 41 |
| Rentals | 33% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or Laguna Hills?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 63750 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z