Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to La Verne
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | La Verne (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 63,750 | 32,320 |
Income (median) | $36,529 | $57,816 |
Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $535,900 |
White | 55% | 74% |
Black | 0% | 4% |
Asian | 3% | 7% |
With Kids | 42% | 30% |
Age (median) | 36 | 43 |
Rentals | 33% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or La Verne?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than La Verne: 63750 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z