Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to Foothill Farms
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,750 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $36,529 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 55% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 3% | 5% |
| With Kids | 42% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 33 |
| Rentals | 33% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or Foothill Farms?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 63750 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z