Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pico Rivera to Beverly Hills
This post compares Pico Rivera, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pico Rivera (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 63,750 | 34,506 |
Income (median) | $36,529 | $82,377 |
Home Value (median) | $380,200 | $2,000,000+ |
White | 55% | 82% |
Black | 0% | 1% |
Asian | 3% | 9% |
With Kids | 42% | 24% |
Age (median) | 36 | 43 |
Rentals | 33% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pico Rivera or Beverly Hills?
A: Pico Rivera has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 63750 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pico Rivera or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Pico Rivera.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pico Rivera or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pico Rivera.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Pico Rivera versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pico Rivera may include: West-Whittier-Los-Nietos, South-Whittier, and Prunedale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z