Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to South Pasadena
This post compares Petaluma, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 78% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
| Rentals | 33% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or South Pasadena?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 60210 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z