Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to San Fernando
This post compares Petaluma, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $370,300 |
| White | 78% | 57% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 32% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 33% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or San Fernando?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than San Fernando: 60210 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z