Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to San Bruno
This post compares Petaluma, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 78% | 49% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 32% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or San Bruno?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than San Bruno: 60210 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z