Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to Riverbank
This post compares Petaluma, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 78% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 33% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or Riverbank?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than Riverbank: 60210 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Petaluma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 33% for Petaluma versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z