Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to Burbank
This post compares Petaluma, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $574,300 |
| White | 78% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 32% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or Burbank?
A: Petaluma has a smaller population count than Burbank: 60210 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z