Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to Beverly Hills
This post compares Petaluma, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 78% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 32% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 33% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or Beverly Hills?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 60210 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z