Compare-Cities.com
Compare Petaluma to Belmont
This post compares Petaluma, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Petaluma (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,210 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $63,243 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $556,900 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 78% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 27% |
| With Kids | 32% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 33% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Petaluma or Belmont?
A: Petaluma has a larger population count than Belmont: 60210 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Petaluma or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Petaluma.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Petaluma or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Petaluma.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Petaluma versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Petaluma may include: Camarillo, Rancho-San-Diego, and Simi-Valley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z