Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Patterson, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 72% | 36% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 51% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or South San Jose Hills?
A: Patterson has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 21497 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Patterson does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Patterson versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z