Compare-Cities.com
Compare Patterson to South San Francisco
This post compares Patterson, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Patterson (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,497 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $43,090 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $258,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 72% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 51% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Patterson or South San Francisco?
A: Patterson has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 21497 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Patterson or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Patterson.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Patterson or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Patterson.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Patterson versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Patterson may include: San-Jacinto, Ceres, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z